As Brad Hooker, the world's leading rule consequentialist, argues, rule consequentialism is not plausibly motivated by a consequentialist commitment to outcomes being as good as possible: the case for rule consequentialism is instead that it impartially justifies intuitively plausible moral rules. Consequentialism is based on two principles: It gives us this guidance when faced with a moral dilemma: And it gives this general guidance on how to live: Different forms of consequentialism differ over what the good thing is that should be maximised. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. While the burglar only sought to benefit themselves, their robbery actually stopped the crime. (From 1), It can never be right to choose something worse over something better, when nothing else is at stake. That is a reason to think that promoting equality in external goods will tend to do more total good than promoting inequality. From utilitarianism and hedonism to egoism and act consequentialism, each form seeks to maximize the net benefits or minimize the harm caused by a decision or action. So, an action may be deemed morally right even if it harms certain individuals or violates their rights as long as the overall outcome is beneficial. In general, whatever is being evaluated, we ought to choose the one that will produce the best overall results. Consequentialism does not itself say what kinds of consequences are good. Now, rationality and objectivity are impartial; they do not favor one person over another. morecambe fc owners examples of moral decisions in everyday life. Friendly Consequentialism: Of all the things a person might do at any given moment, the morally right action is the one that has the best consequences for that person and her friends. However, she also loves to explore different topics such as psychology, philosophy, and more. Negative consequentialists focus exclusively on avoiding unfavorable outcomes when evaluating decisions or behaviors (Scheffler, 2009). So Expectable Consequentialism says my thoughtless selfish action was morally right. It emphasizes the importance of outcomes in determining the morality of an action rather than relying on predetermined moral principles or personal beliefs. Moral common sense is shaped by and for the demands of ordinary moral life and so common sense may not be very reliable in odd cases. This historically important and still popular theory embodies the basic intuition that what is best or right is whatever makes the world best . (i) The objectively right action is the action with the best consequences, and (ii) the morally right action is any action with the best reasonably expected consequences.

General Service Medal Royal Navy, Lena Gieseke And Helena Bonham Carter Look Alike, Articles C